![]() I get a monthly email that the machines I'm backing up are, infact, backing up. It is pretty smart about not consuming all the network bandwidth on a machine (good for places where 1Mbit upload is considered pretty good). I install it, I configure it, I never touch it again unless something goes wrong. The things I love about Backblaze on Windows is that it's very much no-nonsense. I'd like to make a case for making Backblaze on Linux with B2 as the backend (or at least charge like B2). ![]() There's a post here that perfectly explains it, and I'm fully in agreement with the rationale of not just offering flat-rate options. There's been a ton of posts asking about Backblaze on linux OSs.Ī lot of the responses from Backblaze can be summed up as "Offering Backblaze on Linux would make it unprofitable". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |